SATURDAY (2-DEC-23)

Pair 9 - KAY THOMPSON / ALISON METTAM
Place: 6, Percentage: 49.63%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	7: CLAIRE JAMES / JOHN ELLIOTT	2NT E	TH	7	50	7	70%
Board 2	7: CLAIRE JAMES / JOHN ELLIOTT	3 S	4H	11	150	8	80%
Board 3	7: CLAIRE JAMES / JOHN ELLIOTT	2 W	JH	6	200	10	100%
Board 4	5: CONNIE DERKS / ANNE WAKELIN	1NT N	2D	8	120	10	100%
Board 5	5: CONNIE DERKS / ANNE WAKELIN	3 E	AS	9	-140	3	30%
Board 6	5: CONNIE DERKS / ANNE WAKELIN	4 E	JH	11	-150	5	50%
Board 7	2: JOHN MCBEATH / JIM WHITE	2 W	AH	11	200	5	50%
Board 8	2: JOHN MCBEATH / JIM WHITE	3 W	6S	10	170	0	0%
Board 9	2: JOHN MCBEATH / JIM WHITE	3 E	3S	7	-200	2	20%
Board 10	10: ANTONIA OUDMAN / DESIRE BROBERG	4 E	QD	11	650	5	50%
Board 11	10: ANTONIA OUDMAN / DESIRE BROBERG	2 E	4D	7	-50	8	80%
Board 12	10: ANTONIA OUDMAN / DESIRE BROBERG	3 S	AD	9	-140	2	20%
Board 13	6: PETER HEBSON / PAM MINCHIN	4 N	KC	9	-100	3	30%
Board 14	6: PETER HEBSON / PAM MINCHIN	3 N	6D	11	200	1	10%
Board 15	6: PETER HEBSON / PAM MINCHIN	2 W	AD	6	100	7	70%
Board 16	4: PAM BAZLEY / DIANA MENZIES	4 N	3S	10	-420	0	0%
Board 17	4: PAM BAZLEY / DIANA MENZIES	3NT N	5S	9	-400	3	30%
Board 18	4: PAM BAZLEY / DIANA MENZIES	4 S	AH	11	-650	6	60%
Board 19	11: CAROLE MUNRO / JANE ALLEN	3 E	AC	8	-100	5	50%
Board 20	11: CAROLE MUNRO / JANE ALLEN	5 N	AH	11	-650	1	10%
Board 21	11: CAROLE MUNRO / JANE ALLEN	4 W	KD	11	150	6	60%
Board 22	3: KATE BOSTON / MURRAY WEBBER	2NT N	7D	8	-120	6	60%
Board 23	3: KATE BOSTON / MURRAY WEBBER	3NT N	5C	11	-660	0	0%
Board 24	3: KATE BOSTON / MURRAY WEBBER	2 S	8S	7	50	10	100%
Board 25	12: ANNE HAWKINS / SHIRLEY ANDERSON	1NT S	KC	9	-150	6	60%
Board 26	12: ANNE HAWKINS / SHIRLEY ANDERSON	2 N	AH	8	-90	5	50%
Board 27	12: ANNE HAWKINS / SHIRLEY ANDERSON	1NT E	5H	9	150	10	100%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.